Tag-Archive for » short-term credit «

Thursday, January 22nd, 2009 | Author: TomSelleck

As more statistics are gathered regarding payday loans and payday advance providers, we learn more about the realities of these short-term products and fortunately for policy makers have to rely less on the anecdotal experiences repeated ad nauseum by biased consumer activist groups. In the attached report, researchers at Clemson University reveal data that suggests that legality of payday loans in a state does not increase bankruptcy percentages amongst state residents. For years leftists consumer group such as the Center for Responsible Lending, the Coalition of Religious Communities, ACORN and the Consumer Federation of America have falsely repeated time and again that allowing consumers to utilize payday loans increases the probability of bankruptcy amongst consumers. The Clemson Study debunks this myth. Those interested in ready a synopsis of the study can view it here or the full study here.

Policy makers looking to take action against these short-term payday advance loans should carefully review pertinent payday loan studies before making rash decisions at the behest of consumer groups. The findings of the Clemson study is simply another example of how the fact surrounding payday loans reveal how useful a financial tool it can be for those looking at short-term financial needs.

Thursday, December 11th, 2008 | Author: TomSelleck

Just over a week ago on December 3, 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released a study on the impact of bank and credit union overdraft protection programs.   Simply stated, the results were not pretty for the average consumer.  The study revealed that over 70% of depository institutions automatically enroll their customers in some form of overdraft protection programs,  programs that can charge depositors upwards of $35.00 per bounced transaction.  In some instances, availability of these programs can serve as a life preserver to cash-strapped consumers.  Overdrafts are often used by consumers when they face the prospect of bouncing a check.   The bank helps the consumer by paying the check, but putting the depositor in the red at $35.00 a pop.   Sometimes this proves helpful to consumers and other times not so helpful.   The FDIC in their December report gave consumers additional help by revealing the true cost associated with these loan products.

The FDIC study showed that the APR on these products (this is the first time the FDIC formally acknowledged that an APR might be a useful measurement of cost when discussing overdraft and non sufficient fund fees)  can exceed 3,520%!!!! The FDIC reveals that banks alone generated almost $4 billion (BILLION) in additional fees thanks to overdraft and NSF charges in 2006 alone.   These products have proven to be a source of easy money for banks and credit unions, especially in light of the shrinking real estate and commercial lending sources.

When faced with paying these fees, consumers should be aware that cheaper alternatives exist.   Clint Says does not call for the limitation of choice when it comes to personal financial needs, even when it comes at the expense of a 3,500% APR.  However, the FDIC made a smart choice when it used the universal measuring stick of APR to reveal how expensive this form of financing is.   For years, other forms of short-term lending such as payday loans, cash advances, and credit card debt has been under the close scrutiny of state and federal regulators, in large part to the triple digit APR associated with their use.   However,  these alternative credit products deserve a second look by consumers needing short-term cash, especially when the cost associated with them is much cheaper than alternatives like overdraft protection fees and bounced check charges.