Tag-Archive for » bounced check fees «

Tuesday, January 20th, 2009 | Author: TomSelleck

Financially strapped consumers certainly aren’t catching a break from their banks when it comes to the ever-escalating fees and minimum balance requirements for checking accounts and fees and surcharges for ATMs.

There are far safer havens for savvy customers, and if you can live with a free checking account, which generally means no interest, you’ll do your finances a favor.

Here’s what Bankrate found in its 2008 checking study:

-Bounced Check Fees hit New High Again

-ATM Surcharge and fees continue climbing

-Interest Accounts Require High Minimums

-Online Banking Can Be Pricey

Methodology: Bankrate.com surveyed one interest checking account and one non-interest checking account at each of the largest banks and thrifts in each of 25 large markets to find the latest trends on checking account and ATM fees. There were 247 interest accounts and 226 non-interest accounts surveyed at 249 banks and thrifts in the top 25 metropolitan areas.

Cash Advance and Payday Loans pricing remains flat amongst the non traditional segment.  However, as banks and credit unions begin to offer these products, they are increasing their pricing as they find the right pricing point for their customers.

Bankrate.com also looked at 22 checking accounts at 18 institutions offering online accounts and compared them to their brick-and-mortar counterparts.

Thursday, December 11th, 2008 | Author: TomSelleck

Just over a week ago on December 3, 2008, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) released a study on the impact of bank and credit union overdraft protection programs.   Simply stated, the results were not pretty for the average consumer.  The study revealed that over 70% of depository institutions automatically enroll their customers in some form of overdraft protection programs,  programs that can charge depositors upwards of $35.00 per bounced transaction.  In some instances, availability of these programs can serve as a life preserver to cash-strapped consumers.  Overdrafts are often used by consumers when they face the prospect of bouncing a check.   The bank helps the consumer by paying the check, but putting the depositor in the red at $35.00 a pop.   Sometimes this proves helpful to consumers and other times not so helpful.   The FDIC in their December report gave consumers additional help by revealing the true cost associated with these loan products.

The FDIC study showed that the APR on these products (this is the first time the FDIC formally acknowledged that an APR might be a useful measurement of cost when discussing overdraft and non sufficient fund fees)  can exceed 3,520%!!!! The FDIC reveals that banks alone generated almost $4 billion (BILLION) in additional fees thanks to overdraft and NSF charges in 2006 alone.   These products have proven to be a source of easy money for banks and credit unions, especially in light of the shrinking real estate and commercial lending sources.

When faced with paying these fees, consumers should be aware that cheaper alternatives exist.   Clint Says does not call for the limitation of choice when it comes to personal financial needs, even when it comes at the expense of a 3,500% APR.  However, the FDIC made a smart choice when it used the universal measuring stick of APR to reveal how expensive this form of financing is.   For years, other forms of short-term lending such as payday loans, cash advances, and credit card debt has been under the close scrutiny of state and federal regulators, in large part to the triple digit APR associated with their use.   However,  these alternative credit products deserve a second look by consumers needing short-term cash, especially when the cost associated with them is much cheaper than alternatives like overdraft protection fees and bounced check charges.